Studies expand the evidence validating the clinical efficacy of Centinel Spine’s prodisc® L Lumbar Total Disc Replacement (TDR) device compared to two-level hybrid reconstruction.
The study is one of the first long-term mobility comparisons between two-level lumbar TDR and hybrid constructs comprising one-level lumbar TDR combined with one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). A total of 235 patients who underwent lumbar surgery from 2003 to 2013 were followed—consisting of 170 patients receiving L4-S1 two-level lumbar TDR, and 65 patients receiving L5-S1 fusion and L4-L5 TDR hybrid construct.
According to the study, after a minimum of 24 months follow-up, the two-level prodisc L TDR demonstrates superiority in absolute lumbar mobility and pelvic motion. The hybrid construct demonstrates an overall lack of compensation in lumbar mobility and pelvic motion as compared to the two-level lumbar TDR. Although measures of activity and pain were equivalent between the study groups, the two-level TDR also demonstrated functional superiority versus the hybrid construct.
Centinel Spine’s CEO, Steve Murray, said, “This study further reinforces the long-term effectiveness of the prodisc system, a proven technology that supports the advancement of patient care. The system was engineered with proven design principles, and this is another study that demonstrates continued positive results of prodisc L after over 30 years of clinical use.”
Source: Centinel Spine, LLC
Studies expand the evidence validating the clinical efficacy of Centinel Spine's prodisc® L Lumbar Total Disc Replacement (TDR) device compared to two-level hybrid reconstruction.
The study is one of the first long-term mobility comparisons between two-level lumbar TDR and hybrid constructs comprising one-level lumbar TDR combined with...
Studies expand the evidence validating the clinical efficacy of Centinel Spine’s prodisc® L Lumbar Total Disc Replacement (TDR) device compared to two-level hybrid reconstruction.
The study is one of the first long-term mobility comparisons between two-level lumbar TDR and hybrid constructs comprising one-level lumbar TDR combined with one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). A total of 235 patients who underwent lumbar surgery from 2003 to 2013 were followed—consisting of 170 patients receiving L4-S1 two-level lumbar TDR, and 65 patients receiving L5-S1 fusion and L4-L5 TDR hybrid construct.
According to the study, after a minimum of 24 months follow-up, the two-level prodisc L TDR demonstrates superiority in absolute lumbar mobility and pelvic motion. The hybrid construct demonstrates an overall lack of compensation in lumbar mobility and pelvic motion as compared to the two-level lumbar TDR. Although measures of activity and pain were equivalent between the study groups, the two-level TDR also demonstrated functional superiority versus the hybrid construct.
Centinel Spine’s CEO, Steve Murray, said, “This study further reinforces the long-term effectiveness of the prodisc system, a proven technology that supports the advancement of patient care. The system was engineered with proven design principles, and this is another study that demonstrates continued positive results of prodisc L after over 30 years of clinical use.”
Source: Centinel Spine, LLC
You are out of free articles for this month
Subscribe as a Guest for $0 and unlock a total of 5 articles per month.
You are out of five articles for this month
Subscribe as an Executive Member for access to unlimited articles, THE ORTHOPAEDIC INDUSTRY ANNUAL REPORT and more.
JV
Julie Vetalice is ORTHOWORLD's Editorial Assistant. She has covered the orthopedic industry for over 20 years, having joined the company in 1999.